Peter Heehs and his American
supporters at the Archives of Sri Aurobindo Ashram, Pondicherry, should be packed
off to Donald Trump’s country and made to feel the difficulties of common
American citizens instead of allowing them to invent a false and secular
version of Sri Aurobindo’s Yoga in India. Just look at the cheek of this
imposter who once labelled himself as the founder of the Sri Aurobindo Ashram
Archives. He publishes an interview in the Times of India the very next day of
his reinstatement at the Archives in which he smugly says, “It’s possible to be
an atheist and practise a religion.”
Let me tell you first that
this is old hash which he has been repeating from the last 15 years, so there
is nothing brilliantly intellectual about it. It only shows his own failure to
do Yoga and complete inability to become part of Ashram life. Secondly, his statement is an outright
contradiction as an intelligent reader has already commented on the blog. If
you are an atheist, you are generally a materialist and you don’t believe in
spiritual realities. The Divine or God or Ishwara are immaterial spiritual
realities which materialists refuse to believe in, so how can you be an atheist
and still practise a religion or spiritual discipline? The fact that the Divine
can be personal or impersonal or simply an ineffable state of consciousness
such as Nirvana or the Self does not make any difference to the basic contradiction
in his statement – Sri Aurobindo has explained that there is no opposition
between the impersonal and personal Divine, they are two facets of the same
spiritual Reality. Sri Aurobindo thus explains the material reality in terms of
consciousness which is the fundamental reality of existence. The problem with
Peter Heehs is that he wants to always please both materialists and
spiritualists – have the cake and eat it too.
The other implication of his
statement in the context of Sri Aurobindo Ashram is that you can do Sri
Aurobindo’s Yoga without believing in him. You can also dispense with
“senseless rituals” in the Ashram like bowing down at the Samadhi or meditating
in front of Sri Aurobindo’s and Mother’s photos or relying inwardly on their direct inner contact. He does not
say so in the interview but his other articles on Sri Aurobindo and Hinduism
are ample proof of this attitude. In fact, his new book “Spirituality without
God” prepares the larger background for proving more specifically in future the
same attitude towards Sri Aurobindo. So here we are, we know the reason why he
has been reinstated at the Archives with the connivance of the Ashram Trust –
people in the Ashram are becoming too religious, so they have to be educated by
Heehs in order to practise the sadhana as Yogi (or Bhogi!) Peter Heehs has
presented it after 40 years of severe intellectual askesis! I hope we will be
spared of this unwanted transformation of Sri Aurobindo Ashram!
I have not written the above
for the sake of mere amusement because I genuinely feel his reinstatement at
the Archives a serious threat to the spiritual well-being of the Ashram. I would
therefore earnestly appeal to the Home Ministry of India to intervene immediately
and see to it that Heehs and his supporters leave by the first flight to their
own country. If this indeed happens, many of us will be greatly relieved and we
will not hesitate to raise money for their tickets in first class in the best
Airlines available.
