But it was Hegel, among all German thinkers, who had
the deepest and most enduring impact on Western thought and identity. It is
often forgotten that his work was a reaction against the Romantics’
passion for India’s past. He borrowed Indian ideas (such as monism) while
debating Indologists to argue against the value of Indian civilization.
He posited that the West, and only the West, was the agent of history and
teleology. India was the ‘frozen other’, which he used as a foil to define the
West.
Showing posts with label Hegel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hegel. Show all posts
28 Jun 2014
7 Jun 2014
SRI AUROBINDO ON HEGEL
SRI AUROBINDO:
Somebody has said that I have a great
similarity to Hegel because I used the word "synthesis" and he speaks
of thesis, antithesis and synthesis. But I must confess I have no idea of what
Hegel says.
Western philosophies are so mental and
dry. They seem to lead to nothing, only mental gymnastics trying to find out
things like, "What is judgment?" and "What is not
judgment?" They appear to be written for the purpose of using the mind,
not for finding or arriving at the Truth.
(Nirodbaran,
Talks with Sri Aurobindo (2001), 18
January 1939, pp 172-73)
Labels:
Hegel,
Sri Aurobindo
1 Jun 2014
Sri Aurobindo and Hegel (1) – Krish Patwardhan
Situating Sri Aurobindo –
A Reader, edited by Peter Heehs and published by Oxford University Press in 2013, is one
of those arid unreadable books, the heavy metaphysical content of which simply
puts you off. The book is almost entirely a compilation of articles by professors
in American Universities who evaluate, analyse, dissect, compare, and situate
Sri Aurobindo within the framework of their disciplines. Though most of the
essays are surprisingly favourable assessments of Sri Aurobindo, considering
that they have been chosen by Peter Heehs, one still gets the impression
(except in a few cases) that the professors are straying beyond their
legitimate and natural boundaries. Understanding Sri Aurobindo certainly needs some
spiritual empathy, and that comes from a little inward opening, even if it be
only a drop of genuine spiritual experience. Otherwise one commits not only
spiritual but intellectual errors such as some of these professors have made,
despite the expertise in their own fields. I bring to the notice of our readers
one such major misunderstanding by Professor Steve Odin of the University of
Hawai’i, which should be set right before it spreads further in the academic
world. I quote below his conclusion with regard to Sri Aurobindo and Hegel:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)